Zhazyri in the first round in a five-set duel managed to break the resistance of Thiago Monteiro. This is already a good result for him, because before that the Tunisian played, to put it mildly, not in the best way. Agree that defeats from Tomma Paul, Austin Krycek or Mitchell Krueger do not paint at all. But nevertheless, he did not break down in decisive moments, like Monteiro, and managed to get a victory with a score of 7: 6, 4: 6, 6: 3, 5: 7, 6: 4.
As for Millman, he sent home of Nika Kirgios (6: 3, 1: 6, 6: 4, 6: 4). As I expected, the duel of the Australians turned out to be a horse and ended quite unexpectedly, since Nick could expect to go far in New York. Therefore, Go to Casino X and play online with bonus 200 freespins after registation. it is worth paying tribute to Millman, who withstood the power and pressure.
The only meeting of tennis players took place last year in Cincinnat. Then Millman won in three sets, with a score of 6: 4, 5: 7, 6: 3. In my opinion, we can expect a similar picture this time, since it is really difficult to single out a favorite in this pair. One takes power and serve, the other is good at counterattacks and is mobile.
Bookmakers have a clear preference for the Australian, but I don’t think it will be that easy for him. Therefore, here I will take a bet on the fact that at least one party.
The American with problems made his way to the second round, beating Maximilian Marterer (6: 3, 1: 6, 6: 1, 6: 4), although here we can assume that Young still relaxed after winning the first game, let the opponent. to play out, but then he turned on himself. However, his performance this season leaves a lot to be desired. To be honest, I remember him only at Wimbledon – the fight in the third set against Rafa Nadal.
As for the Frenchman, he passed a little in the end and does not show that sparkling tennis that we are used to seeing in his performance. After Wimbledon, he somehow disappeared, managed to lose to such rivals as Yuki Bambra, but from the first match at the US Open it was clear that he was playing with the mood. It was this attitude that allowed him to beat Jeremiah Shardy quite comfortably (7: 6, 6: 3, 6: 4), which is not so easy on hard.
Therefore, I tend to give preference to Monfils, who is faster, more powerful and more experienced than the opponent. But for his clear victory, they give not the best coefficient even for an express, and I will take here the victory of the Frenchman with a handicap (-1.5).